<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>92.7 WOBM &#187; words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wobm.com/tags/words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wobm.com</link>
	<description>Ocean County&#039;s Hometown Station!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Euphemisms &#8211; Do You Use Them? [Poll]</title>
		<link>http://wobm.com/euphemisms-do-you-use-them-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://wobm.com/euphemisms-do-you-use-them-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Louis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wobm.com/?p=58758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Passed away&#8221;, &#8220;no longer with us&#8221;, &#8220;deceased&#8221; &#8211; they&#8217;re all different ways that we use to say that someone has died. They&#8217;re euphemisms that we use to soften the term a bit. But is this a good thing or a bad thing? When I was in college, I took an interesting sociology class, &#8220;Death, Grief, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Passed away", "no longer with us", "deceased" - they're all different ways that we use to say that someone has died. They're <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/euphemism" target="_blank">euphemisms</a> that we use to soften the term a bit. But is this a good thing or a bad thing?</p>
<p class="more_act text"><a href="http://wobm.com/euphemisms-do-you-use-them-poll/" title="Euphemisms &#8211; Do You Use Them? [Poll]">Read More</a><em>|</em><a href="http://wobm.com/euphemisms-do-you-use-them-poll/#comments_wrap" title="Euphemisms &#8211; Do You Use Them? [Poll]">Comment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wobm.com/euphemisms-do-you-use-them-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/wobm.com/files/2012/03/Dictionaries.jpg" height="375" width="500" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Flickr user torisan3500</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 705/731 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/wobm.com

Served from: wobm.com @ 2013-05-22 07:33:35 -->